Town Board Mulls Possible Abolition of Elected Highway Superintendent Post

Public hearing set for Aug. 14 in Huntington regarding possible Nov. 6 referendum; consolidation plan.

A public hearing has been set for Aug. 14 to consider a possible November referendum which could abolish the Department of General Services and create of a Department of Public Works in the .

If approved by voters Nov. 6, the plan would grant the Town Board authority to appoint in 2014 the position of superintendent of highways — currently an elected post chosen by voters.

The consolidation of the into the Public Works Department would be done for fiscal purposes and to promote efficiency, according to Town Supervisor . 

Three non-agenda resolutions were presented in executive session hours before Tuesday's meeting at Town Hall: the first, to create a Department of Public Works; a second to change the office of highway superintendent to an appointed office, and a third resolution to abolish the Department of General Services. All would require a public hearing and final Aug. 14.

Each resolution passed, 3-2, with Town Councilmen Gene Cook and Mark Mayoka opposed to the timing of the proposals.

Cook said voters — many of whom will be away on summer vacations — would not have a chance to voice opinions at the public hearing.

"I think this is not the right time to do this, I say we put it off until September," said Cook. "If we can't do that because of time restraints, put it off until next year."

Petrone said the proposal would have to be done in a timely manor to satisfy the requirement of the New York State Board of Elections so it gets on the November presidential ballot — when turnout is expected to be highest. 

An analysis regarding Town spending, equipment, operational and personnel costs would be done before the public hearing, according to Petrone.

"Perhaps there will not be a vast savings in the number of personnel but there certainly will be an opportunity then to deploy personnel throughout the town in other functions," said Petrone.

Cuthberston argued the decision to hold a public hearing in August is not as important as the final vote next month to decide whether or not the issue goes on the ballot in November.

"This is something we can offer to the voter and there can be educated debate and thought process about whether this would effect government consolidation and whether this would allow greater financial efficiencies," said Cuthbertson.

Warning against the possibility of changing the separation of duties within Town government, Mayoka said eliminating an elected position would take control and power away from the electorate.

"This is is why the majority of municipalities in New York have it separated," said Mayoka.

Relations between current Highway Superintendent and the Town of Huntington have been contentious in previous years.

A lawsuit,  in 2010 alleged Naughton severely compromised the Town Board's ability to perform its statutory duty to manage and amend its budget and finances, and create or abolish positions as it deems advisable by hiring eight men who were not approved by the Town Board.

In 2000, Naughton sued the Town for not allowing him to place five highway department employees on the payroll. The court sided with the Town, stating that salaries and positions of the employees were not included in the operating budget.

Mayoka said he was happy with current services provided by the Highway Department and questioned the efficiency of the plan.

If the resolutions pass, Naughton would remain in his position for remainder of his term and he could "remain in some capacity" after his term is complete, according to Cuthberston.

The consolidation idea was precipitated by a unanimous vote in Brookhaven regarding a similar proposal, according to Cuthbertson.

"We should look to the experience of our surrounding similar towns," said Cuthbertson.

Hikerr July 26, 2012 at 10:46 AM
WOW, I've heard it said that if you go against Petrone & Co. they will come after you. What's the big rush? Is this Franks last hoorah before Nov? If Brookhaven has done this then let's wait and see how it works out before we jump in, it may be a bad deal.
MrsE July 26, 2012 at 11:39 AM
Petrone is so transparent it's sickening. The Superintendent won't play nice with Frank, so he want's him under his thumb, so he can be rid of him and create another cushy patronage post for one of his friends. It's sickening, wake up voters and shut him down.
JSC July 26, 2012 at 11:48 AM
That's what I was thinking - this is all political garbage. We know Petrone doesn't like Naughton, we know he wants to control the money in the highway budget. Who's getting the position of Director of Public Works and who will grab all the Ass't Director positions (or whatever they'll be called)? Is this going to cost us more in salaries and benefits? I don't like the idea of having taxpayers lose the right to vote for certain town officials. It starts here, what's next? No vote for Town Clerk or Tax Receiver?
John Dornheim July 26, 2012 at 03:31 PM
Little more than a personal vendetta. Perhaps the office of supervisor needs eliminating?
jane July 26, 2012 at 05:48 PM
Wow, These two depts. work just fine. IF it aint broke, don't fix it. And I think maybe some people are right. Who's relative is waiting for a job? Actually these two depts. seem to work better than most.
Frank H. July 26, 2012 at 06:14 PM
I my option William Naughton and Frank Petrone have both have been in there public service jobs too long. I think its time for a change in both postions.
Linda Otta July 26, 2012 at 07:25 PM
Then vote for it (or against it) but don't go and vote in November for your right to NO LONGER vote for this position. What a sham!
Greg Packer July 27, 2012 at 01:18 AM
Change should come from an election......not appointments.
Big_E July 28, 2012 at 02:20 AM
What's next, Receiver of Taxes? Town Clerk? I do not trust the town board to appoint these elected positions. They will simply appoint their friends and cronies. The positions will be up to the highest bidder. As it is, yes Bill Naughton has has his job for over 20 years. But Jo-Ann Raia has had hers for 31 years. Bivona for 21 years. Petrone, for 19 years. Cuthbertson has been on the board for 14 years. Berland for 11 years. Do we really trust Petrone, Cuthbertson and Berland with making an honest decision on appointing jobs? I don't. Leave it up to the people of Huntington.
Dad of Three July 28, 2012 at 04:30 AM
Change for the sake of change alone is lunacy. There hasn't been a sensible candidate for the Town Board since Tracy Edwards, and she was done in by the Democratic Party bosses in the town, who resented her independence and willingness to cooperate with Republicans. But, if we can find better candidates than the second-rate crew which the Republican Party bosses usually put up, then I'd be all for giving Frank a rest, and sending Cuthbertson back to basic human decency school. Berland at least has some independent sparks in her political practice, and is a pretty hard-working member of the Town Board.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something